Capture the deposition once. The record remembers what changed.
Tapestry turns the deposition notes you already take into a source-backed matter record. You validate each fact against your own notes — then the trial chart, the client report, and the carrier packet update from that record, instead of being reconstructed by hand. One validated fact, current everywhere it matters.
No new workflow to learn — bring the notes you already take.
Your notes, as taken
pltf @ Sparrows Point shipyard ’68–’74 — insulation crews, pipe covering everywhere…
remembers “JM” stamped on the boxes — white corrugated covering…
co-worker R. Alvarez, same gang ’70–’72 — will confirm…
no respirators until at least ’74…
Structured facts — your review
Trial-group chart — live
Reads the record| Plaintiff | Product ID | MSJ due |
|---|---|---|
| Abernathy | Identified | Sep 18 |
| Merritt | UnknownIdentified2 | Sep 18 |
| Kowalski | Not ID’d | Sep 18 |
Illustrative — every fact anchors to your own notes, and the record changes only when you approve it.
The reconstruction tax
The firm already knows. The record doesn’t.
You finish a deposition and the evaluation is already done in your head — who said what, what it means, what happens next. But the trial chart still says Unknown. The client report is three weeks stale. The claims administrator wants the same facts typed into a portal, again. So the partner asks the associate, the associate asks the paralegal, and someone opens three summaries to confirm what everyone already learned weeks ago — reconstructing the same case, by hand, for every chart, report, packet, and portal that depends on it.
The facts never live anywhere as facts. Every document reconstructs them from prose — every time.
How it works
AI proposes. You validate. The record remembers.
Capture
Paste or dictate the deposition notes you already take. Tapestry reads them and proposes what the testimony changed — product identifications, exposure facts, witnesses, dates — each anchored to the exact line of your notes it came from.
Validate
One clean question at a time, with the supporting note in front of you — not a form. Confirm, correct, or reject. Nothing enters the record that you didn’t sign off on.
Remember
The matter record updates, and every view of it follows. The trial chart flips from Unknown to Identified — cited. The summary, the client report, the carrier packet: projections of the same validated facts, never separate reconstructions.
The chart national counsel wants, the packet the administrator requires, the report the client keeps asking for — views of the same record, not separate reconstruction projects.
Why Tapestry
Not another summarizer
Provenance on every fact.
Every assertion traces to the note it came from — and to who validated it, and when. Click the cell; see the source. Six months from now, the answer is never “I think somebody updated that.”
A record that remembers.
Across time: the answer is still there at the dispositive-motion deadline, still cited. Across people: status doesn’t walk out the door in someone’s head. Across organizations: the chart, the report, and the packet are views of one record.
Your authorship, preserved.
The model proposes; you decide. There are no autonomous edits to the record. Your judgment is on every line that leaves the building.
Built for the portfolio.
Seventy-five defendants on one complaint, each on its own path. Tapestry works at the defendant-matter level, so a trial group resolves into cohorts — the no-ID cases surface their next move together, not one file at a time.
Built inside the practice
Tapestry is built by a practicing insurance-defense attorney who takes three to five depositions a week and runs it on real matters with real deadlines. Every feature exists because a deadline demanded it. It was designed by someone who has sat through a coordinated asbestos deposition — and it shows in the first five minutes of a demo.
— built and used daily by its founder
Security & trust
Trust is auditable, not asserted.
Your data stays yours
Persisted in a system you control, under standard processor terms.
Models that retain nothing
Extraction runs against zero-data-retention–contracted models. No AI vendor keeps your work product.
Provenance, end to end
Every generated artifact carries its lineage back to source. Trust is auditable, not asserted.
See it run on a deposition you actually took.
The best demo is your own work. Bring notes you’ve already worked up, and we’ll generate your deliverables in front of you — fact by fact, source by source.